May 21, 2026

For years, the United States told itself a reassuring story: China could manufacture and copy, but it couldn't innovate. That story is no longer credible. From DeepSeek's compute-efficient AI model to BYD's dominance of the global EV market, China is producing both volume and quality across sectors that matter. The question is no longer whether China can compete — it's whether the United States is playing its own hand well.
In this episode of TechSurge, host Michael Marks speaks with Vivek Chilukury, Senior Fellow at CNAS, where he focuses on U.S.–China technology competition, AI policy, and digital geopolitics. Vivek's path from counter-terrorism work at the State Department to tech policy in the Senate gives him an unusually grounded perspective on how government actually functions — and where it keeps failing itself.
Vivek and Michael work through the full competitive landscape: the wake-up moments that shifted Washington's focus from manufacturing to technology dominance, why the dual-use nature of advanced technology has pulled the national security community into conversations once left to industry, and what Made in China 2025 actually achieved — and where it fell short.
The conversation goes deep on America's policy toolkit: what the CHIPS Act accomplished and why it wasn't enough, how export controls on advanced semiconductors are working and what they're missing, and why Washington is far too weighted toward restriction at the expense of the "run faster" side of the equation. Vivek is also candid about what DeepSeek really tells us — not just about Chinese innovation, but about the gap between building a model and deploying AI at scale.
They also explore the global dimension: China's "easy button" approach to technology exports, what the U.S. AI exports program is trying to do in response, the rise of "AI sovereignty" movements from Brussels to Delhi, and why the talent and immigration decisions of the past year amount to a serious self-inflicted wound.
The United States still holds the best hand in the world for this competition. The question Vivek keeps returning to is whether we're playing it well — and right now, his honest answer is no.
Sign up for our newsletter at techsurgepodcast.com for updates on upcoming TechSurge Live Summits and future Season 2 episodes.
Episode Links:
Timestamps:
[02:11] Wake-Up Calls: Chips & 5G
[04:17] Atoms vs Bits in AI
[07:27] China's Innovation Surge
[10:57] Systems Capital vs Planning
[14:14] Made in China 2025 Scorecard
[17:23] US Tools: Chips & Controls
[24:12] DeepSeek & Compute Scarcity
[26:47] Energy Constraints & Scaling
[29:01] AI Exports & the Easy Button
[32:43] Allies & AI Sovereignty
[36:13] Talent Flows & Immigration
[39:04] Beyond AI: The Biotech Frontier
[43:30] Founder Advice: Global South
[45:20] Wrap-Up & Key Takeaways

Every gigawatt of new AI infrastructure now costs $50 to $60 billion to build, roughly $45 billion of which goes straight into GPUs. With more than 400 gigawatts of new compute needed by 2030, the industry faces a roughly $24 trillion capital bill. But according to this week's guest, the real threat to Western AI competitiveness isn't Nvidia, Google, or Broadcom out-maneuvering one another. It's China Inc., which is targeting a cost of under $10 billion per gigawatt, a five- to six-times cost advantage that could reshape who wins the AI infrastructure race.
In this episode of TechSurge, host David Goldman speaks with Raja Koduri, one of the most influential architects in the history of graphics computing. Raja twice led graphics at AMD, directed graphics architecture at Apple, and served as chief architect of Intel's Core and Visual Computing Group. His team helped bring high bandwidth memory to market for AMD's GPUs back in 2015, a technology that now underpins nearly every AI accelerator on the market.
The conversation centers on Raja's new startup, Oxmiq, which he describes as converting "electrons to tokens super efficiently." Raja and David dig into why the bottleneck in AI infrastructure has quietly shifted away from raw compute and toward memory hierarchy, how data moves between SRAM, HBM, and NAND, and between chips, now that models are too large to fit on a single die. Oxmiq's approach uses 3D-stacked, hybrid-bonded memory to unlock 10x the bandwidth of today's HBM and a 10x increase in token generation rate, even on older process nodes.
From there, the discussion turns to how AI coding agents are changing the economics of chip design. Raja argues that spec-writing, once the "boring" 90 percent of the job, is now the hardest and most valuable skill, while writing the code itself is increasingly something agents can handle. He points to OpenAI and Broadcom's Jalapeño chip as evidence that AI-assisted design can compress timelines that used to take multiple generations of custom silicon. Raja also reflects on lessons from building products alongside Steve Jobs at Apple and Lisa Su at AMD, and explains why he believes Intel's decision to kill 3D XPoint memory came at exactly the wrong moment.
The episode closes with Raja's outlook on where AI infrastructure goes next: a future of both massive "token factories" and smaller, personal "token banks," a shift he compares to the transition offices went through with server rooms, becoming invisible infrastructure that simply works. As he puts it, "the more boring you make it, the more it becomes fabulous."
Sign up for our newsletter at techsurgepodcast.com for updates on upcoming TechSurge Live Summits and future episodes.
.png)
Almost 2% of U.S. GDP will be spent on AI infrastructure this year, nearly double 2025's figure. But beneath those headline numbers, the composition of that spending has quietly flipped: for the first time, dollars spent on running models in production now outweigh dollars spent training them.
In this episode of TechSurge, host David Goldman speaks with Austin Lyons, a semiconductor analyst at Creative Strategies, co-host of the Semi Doped podcast, and author of the Chipstrat newsletter. Lyons previously worked as a hardware engineer at Intel and as a product manager on John Deere's autonomous tractor and Blue River Technology teams before turning to full-time chip industry analysis.
The conversation opens with why AI buyers have moved from assembling commoditized parts to buying entire pre-integrated systems, tracing how Nvidia's rack-scale approach, exemplified by its 72-GPU Grace Blackwell racks, made turnkey deployment the default, and why that raises the bar for any chip startup trying to compete. Lyons and Goldman then unpack how inference workloads have split into two distinct problems, prefill and decode, and how that split created an opening for SRAM-based challengers to outperform general-purpose GPUs on decode speed.
From there, the discussion turns to the rise of neoclouds, the GPU-rental companies that grew into public businesses worth well over $100 billion combined, and why so many traditional investors missed them. Lyons and Goldman work through the circular financing debate head-on: the mechanics of Nvidia's equity stakes, GPU-backed debt, and hyperscaler off-take agreements that critics compare to dot-com-era vendor financing, and the counterargument that demand is simply outrunning fixed supply.
The episode closes on Lyons's own framework for identifying the next trillion-dollar chip company, built on four conditions including the ability to run trillion-parameter models at rack scale, beat an incumbent on a key performance metric, and land a frontier anchor customer, along with a look at how AI-assisted chip design is lowering the barrier for more companies, from OpenAI to electric vehicle makers, to design their own custom silicon.
Sign up for our newsletter at techsurgepodcast.com for updates on upcoming TechSurge Live Summits and future episodes.
.png)
In this episode, Nobel Prize-winning physicist Dr. John Martinis reveals how his breakthrough in superconducting qubits made quantum physics real at macroscopic scale and what it means for the future of technology. The former lead of Google's Quantum AI lab explains why quantum computing is so fragile, why a lot of hype has a low chance to work, and why his fabless company Qolab could be the Nvidia of quantum computing.
In this conversation, Dr. Martinis joins Tech Surge to explain the science behind macroscopic quantum coherence, the engineering challenges of scaling quantum computers, and how hybrid quantum-classical computing will shape the future of technology.
The conversation covers:
✅ How the superconducting qubit breakthrough won the Nobel Prize in Physics
✅ Why Nature wants to destroy quantum coherence and why quantum is fragile
✅ From academic physics to building Google's quantum computer
✅ The engineering challenge of scaling quantum computing beyond the lab
✅ Why a lot of quantum computing hype has a low chance to work
✅ How Qolab's fabless model could scale quantum hardware
Sign up for our newsletter at techsurgepodcast.com for updates on upcoming TechSurge Live Summits and future episodes.